Disclaimer: You are looking at a post I wrote some time ago. The information and opinions contained within may be outdated and may differ from my current views. Please proceed accordingly.

Mr. White: Plea Bargain Time?

May 18, 2007 4:38 PM
Tags: news, teaneck

I was just discussing with a friend how there has been no news since the arrest of my former Assistant Principal on almost a year ago.

Well, there was some news today: a plea bargain offer:

Former principal offered plea deal in child endangerment case

Former Teaneck High School principal Joseph White was offered a one-year jail term on Friday in return for a guilty plea to a reduced charge stemming for what prosecutors said was a graphic conversation he had with a student last year.

The 61-year-old veteran educator also would have to register as a sex offender under Megan’s Law if he accepts the deal.

Assistant Bergen County Prosecutor Patricia Baglivi said [...] the offer calls for White to plead guilty to third-degree charges of child endangerment and official misconduct. White now stands charged with second-degree offenses that carry penalties of up to 10 years in prison.

Plea bargains are such a weird thing, with the issues they raise. It seems morally (if not logically) bizarre to accept a plea bargain if you're not guilty and for a prosecutor to offer one if they think you are.


Comments: Mr. White: Plea Bargain Time?

Plea bargains aren't bizarre at all. The prosecutor offers one when s/he is convinced the defendant is guilty but fears that a jury might not convict, or that the jury or judge might give too low a sentence, or if the defendant agrees to give information that would incriminate other persons. And it's not bizarre or immoral for the defendant to accept one. It's a very rare innocent defendant who accepts a plea bargain. And for the guilty ones, it saves the further embarrassment of admitting their crimes in open court, or deny them and being proven guilty.

Posted by: Rob on May 19, 2007 10:56 PM | permalink

Rob:

I agree they make *logical* sense. I'm just saying that, morally, it seems bizarre to say "I'll let you get away with your crime, if you admit to something else".

Posted by: Joe Grossberg on May 20, 2007 7:50 AM | permalink

"I'm just saying that, morally, it seems bizarre to say "I'll let you get away with your crime, if you admit to something else"."

Sometimes it shows real remorse and acceptance of responsibility for what happened. In a way, it's a reduction of punishment for a show of better character.

Posted by: *dell on May 21, 2007 2:21 PM | permalink

Hmm, that's a good point: "If you admit you did something wrong, we'll be less harsh."

Posted by: Joe Grossberg on May 21, 2007 4:50 PM | permalink

"It's a very rare innocent defendant who accepts a plea bargain."

That's not been my experience talking with people who have faced long sentences for alleged drug crimes.

More often, in exchange for a little snitching or just the courtesy of saving the gov't the expense of a trial, many innocent people, especially those without an excellent criminal defense lawyer, take whatever plea is offered to get less than the draconian amount of prison time mandated by legislatures, and entirely controlled by the prosecutor's discretion in charging (felony vs. misdeameanor, etc.)

Posted by: Danny G on May 23, 2007 5:06 PM | permalink

I agree with you Danny. Innocent people do accept plea bargins because facing a length of time in state prison us unbearable. If for some unfortunate reason the justice system gets you in their clutches you have to make a choice. Do I take this deal and walk away for do I face the possibility of going to state prison? Tuff choice.

Posted by: Terri on September 10, 2007 1:30 PM | permalink

No more comments! Either someone has violated Godwin's Law, I'm tired of the discussion or, most likely, the ten-week window has closed. You can, however, contact me through email.