Why the Gmail Bill was Proposed
Tags:
update Gmail is a free web-based email service that will be offered by Google, roughly analogous to Hotmail.
I agree it's a stupid bill, but Aaron is missing the point:
A (being charitable) confused California Senator has proposed a bill to outlaw Gmail because of the ads it includes in email.
It's not just because there are ads — after all, Yahoo! and Hotmail already do this — but because of how the ads are determined: by searching through the content of your messages.
Of course, this is still your typical example of a heavy-handed law designed to protect people from their own stupidity; I'd prefer Google just be up-front about what you're trading in exchange for a free email service and let people make their own informed decision (like TiVo users whose viewing habits are carefully monitored).
Also, it should be noted that it was only a California State Senator; this wasn't clear in the cited post.
Note: if Google Weblog allowed comments, this post would have been unnecessary. (Hint, hint.)
What's being missed is you *HAVE* to look through someone's message to do spam control too. So it's not like it ever had any "privacy" in the first place. I don't necessarily think I'd use it, but then I don't know. Honestly, I think they just need to disclose it, but past that, I think getting a law involved is the height of stupidity. Obviously they have no other problems in the state of California.
Posted by: petrilli on April 14, 2004 2:20 PM | permalinkPlus:
* there might very well be shit like that in other services, and they're just not as forthcoming
* online advertising (e.g. spam, spyware, etc.) has achieved a really bad reputation
No more comments! Either someone has violated Godwin's Law, I'm tired of the discussion or, most likely, the ten-week window has closed. You can, however, contact me through email.