Presidential Doublespeak
Tags:
update Calpundit has more on the evolving terminology.
Says our leader, "[T]he Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities."
Umm ... what the hell does that mean? It's so obfuscated as to be meaningless.
Seriously, how did that make it into a written speech?
I could understand if it was an interview or debate and he stumbled over his phrasing.
But it's not even "weapons of mass destruction programs". It's just "activities" that are "related" to them.
So much for that line of argument.
"Seriously, how did that make it into a written speech?"
The CIA director, Tenet, gave him bad info again?
Posted by: O'dell on January 21, 2004 9:41 PM | permalinkNo more comments! Either someone has violated Godwin's Law, I'm tired of the discussion or, most likely, the ten-week window has closed. You can, however, contact me through email.