Here's another good site critical of Michael Moore's opus: Bowling for Truth.

One of my favorite things about the web as a communications medium is that it forces people to answer their critics. And sometimes that even favors the criticized party, because they can make a case that they're doing the right thing, instead of letting people adopt stances based on misunderstanding.

Similarly, Eugene Volokh chastises Slate for taking a Bush quote so far out of context that the meaning is reversed.

When I was younger, I would read two sections of the paper: sports (duh) and Letters to the Editor. For some reason, the latter always interested me more than the "news"; I think I intuitively sensed (and still do) that there's more truth in conversation than a one-way broadcast.

No more comments! Either someone has violated Godwin's Law, I'm tired of the discussion or, most likely, the ten-week window has closed. You can, however, contact me through email.