Disclaimer: You are looking at a post I wrote some time ago. The information and opinions contained within may be outdated and may differ from my current views. Please proceed accordingly.

Letter to a Journalist about Rachel Corrie

Jun 30, 2003 9:16 PM
Tags:
update The article about Rachel Corrie has been published

I got my first inquiry from a journalist about this website. She wanted to know some background information about me and how I'd gotten interested in Rachel Corrie's death.

I'll link to the article if/when it's published. Below is my response, in part:
My initial comments on Rachel Corrie's death, like most posts on my weblog, were a brief commentary on something I found noteworthy. In hindsight, I should have taken the time to be more thoughful in my commentary, but I still adhere to my central point:

Rachel Corrie was someone who hated America, hated Israel, hated the West and actively supported terrorists who held those same beliefs.

She was not someone who made the ultimate sacrifice in the name of peace; to assert as much is obscene.

Rachel Corrie was not a misguided, idealistic college kid, much less someone acting on behalf of a noble cause. Her words and actions were just plain wrong.

And that is how I became interested in her story — I saw many websites casting her in a martyr's light and did not want their lies to go unchallenged.

I have a great deal of sympathy for innocent Palestinian children and the horrors they've lived through; I have no sympathy for a woman who stands in the way of peace and perpetuates their plight by glorifying terrorism and indoctrinating hatred.


Comments: Letter to a Journalist about Rachel Corrie

wow! you are totally famous. or this journalist is totally ghetoo.

Posted by: pam on June 30, 2003 10:37 PM | permalink

I love your response. Rachel Corrie chose a side in a war and died fighting in it.

Posted by: Kashei on July 1, 2003 12:45 PM | permalink


That's dope, especially since your viewpoint is 100% on the mark. But I too wonder if the journalist isn't just some big boofus.....

Posted by: Nicardo on July 1, 2003 6:48 PM | permalink

I have no idea who Kashei and Nicardo are, but you are cool in my book.

Kashei, you make me regret getting out of political blogging.

Posted by: Daniel Grossberg on July 2, 2003 4:32 PM | permalink

Nicardo is a friend from college; Kashei is a random blogger whose site I discovered in the course of the Rachel Corrie flame war.

Posted by: Joe Grossberg on July 2, 2003 5:02 PM | permalink

RACHEL CORRIE: A SAD “SOLIDARITY” STORY!!!

By Gary Fitleberg

According to the International Solidarity Movement (ISM) and falsely perpetuated by the vast majority of the media, allegedly "Rachel Corrie was murdered by Israel while she was peacefully protesting against the illegal demolition of a Palestinian home."

American Rachel Corrie was killed in the Gaza Strip on March 16, 2003, when she entered an area where Israeli forces were carrying out a military operation. The incident tragically and unfortunately occurred while IDF forces were removing shrubbery along the security road near the border between Israel and Egypt at Rafah to uncover explosive devices, and destroying tunnels used by Palestinian terrorists to illegally smuggle weapons from Egypt to Gaza.

Corrie was not demonstrating for peace or trying to shield innocent civilians, she was interfering with a military operation to legally demolish an empty house used to conceal one of these tunnels.

A misleading photo published by the Associated Press gave the impression that Corrie was standing in front of the bulldozer and shouting at the driver with a megaphone, trying to prevent the driver from tearing down a building in the refugee camp. This photo, which was taken by a member of Corrie’s organization, was not shot at the time of her death, however, but hours earlier. The photographer said that Corrie was actually sitting and waving her arms when she was struck (Christian Science Monitor, April 02, 2003).

Israel’s Judge Advocate’s Office investigated the incident and concluded that the driver of the bulldozer never saw or heard Corrie because she was standing behind debris that obstructed the view of the driver whose field of view was limited by the small armored windows of his cab. An autopsy found that the cause of Corrie’s death was falling debris (Jerusalem Post, June 26, 2003).

The State Department warned Americans not to travel to Gaza, and Israel made clear that civilians who enter areas where troops are engaged in counter-terror operations put themselves unnecessarily at risk. This was not the first time protestors have tried to obstruct Israeli operations, and the IDF has made every effort to avoid harming them. This case received worldwide publicity in large measure because it was the first such incident where a protestor was killed. In fact, the army had told Corrie and other demonstrators from the anti-Israel International Solidarity Movement (ISM) to move out of the way. "It’s possible they [the protesters] were not as disciplined as we would have liked," admitted Thom Saffold, a founder and organizer of ISM (Washington Post, March 17, 2003).

The death of an innocent civilian is always tragic, and the best way to avoid such tragedies in the future is, first and foremost, by the Palestinian Authority putting an end to violence, and stopping the smuggling operations that have brought huge quantities of illegal weapons into the Gaza Strip. Activists interested in peace should be protesting the Palestinian actions. Activists also have every right to express their views about Israel’s policies, but they should take care to avoid the appearance of siding with the terrorists or placing themselves in positions where they could be inadvertently caught in the crossfire of a counter-terror operation or otherwise endangered by entering an area where military operations are being conducted.

Gary Fitleberg is a Political Analyst specializing in International Relations with emphasis on Middle East affairs.

Posted by: Gary Fitleberg on July 17, 2003 5:50 PM | permalink

My position is that the International Solidarity Movement and its Palestinian handlers are largely responsible for Rachel Corrie's death. It was, in fact, in the interests of the Palestinian to put her into a situation where she (or another foreign volunteer) would be killed or seriously hurt. A Hamas activist, in fact, boasted of the propaganda his side could make from this well-meaning and innocent, but unfortunately naive, woman's death. See http://www.omdurman.org/ism.html for details.

Posted by: Bill Levinson on August 13, 2003 5:46 PM | permalink

"Rachel Corrie was someone who hated America, hated Israel, hated the West and actively supported terrorists who held those same beliefs."

How do I know that?

I read her writings. I read of her actions. I read her organization's literature. I read of their actions.

Posted by: Joe Grossberg on August 20, 2003 9:07 AM | permalink

Rachel Corrie may not have used the best judgement when she ultimately chose to stand in front of the large bulldozer, and ultimately lost her life, but it in NO way justifies Israel's occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem, or the fact that the soldier driving the bulldozer was absolutely reckless.

Posted by: M on August 21, 2003 11:15 PM | permalink

No one says Corrie's poor judgement justifies the Israeli occupation of the Territories. That was justified way before she came on the scene.

The bulldozer's driver wasn't reckless; she was.

Posted by: Joe Grossberg on August 22, 2003 5:26 PM | permalink

Tragically, Rachel Corrie got carried away and used some poor judgement, but equally tragic was the recklessness of the soldier driving the bulldozer.

Posted by: M on August 22, 2003 10:51 PM | permalink

No more comments! Either someone has violated Godwin's Law, I'm tired of the discussion or, most likely, the ten-week window has closed. You can, however, contact me through email.